<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Hard Drives on KnightLi Blog</title>
        <link>https://www.knightli.com/en/tags/hard-drives/</link>
        <description>Recent content in Hard Drives on KnightLi Blog</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:05:45 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.knightli.com/en/tags/hard-drives/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
        <title>Seagate Exos 2X14 Dual-Arm HDD: Cheap, Fast, Large, and Not for Everyone</title>
        <link>https://www.knightli.com/en/2026/05/01/seagate-exos-2x14-dual-actuator-hdd/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:05:45 +0800</pubDate>
        
        <guid>https://www.knightli.com/en/2026/05/01/seagate-exos-2x14-dual-actuator-hdd/</guid>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;The Seagate Exos 2X14 / Mach.2 is a rather unusual enterprise mechanical hard drive.
Its key selling point is not just capacity, but its dual-arm design: a single 14TB drive appears to the system as two 7TB logical disks, with each side using its own head-arm assembly for parallel access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That makes it look very tempting on the used market.
When ordinary 14TB enterprise drives are being pushed up in price, these retired dual-arm drives can sometimes offer 14TB of capacity for less money while delivering sequential speeds close to SATA SSD territory.
But this is not a normal NAS drive that everyone should buy as a drop-in replacement.
Its strengths and risks are both obvious, and they need to be understood before buying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;why-it-can-be-so-fast&#34;&gt;Why It Can Be So Fast
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;A normal mechanical hard drive has one head-arm assembly, so reads and writes are mainly handled by one group of heads at a time.
The Exos 2X14 / Mach.2 splits one physical drive into two 7TB logical units, allowing two head-arm groups to work at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each 7TB logical disk can reach roughly 250MB/s in sequential reads and writes, similar to many large enterprise HDDs.
If the two 7TB logical disks are combined as RAID 0, large sequential transfers can approach 500MB/s when there is no network bottleneck.
That is close to mainstream SATA SSD performance and enough to saturate a 2.5G network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this boost mainly applies to large sequential transfers.
4K small files, fragmented files, and random access do not suddenly become fast just because of the dual-arm design and RAID 0.
It is still a mechanical hard drive at heart, so small-file workloads remain slow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-biggest-barrier-is-hardware-compatibility&#34;&gt;The Biggest Barrier Is Hardware Compatibility
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most low-priced units available on the used market are retired server drives with SAS interfaces, not SATA models.
That means they are not suitable for most off-the-shelf NAS systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumer and prosumer NAS devices from brands such as UGREEN, Synology, and QNAP are usually designed around SATA backplanes, and SAS drives often cannot be used directly.
DIY NAS users also need extra hardware:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;An available PCIe slot on the motherboard&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A SAS HBA or RAID card, such as an LSI 2008 flashed to IT mode&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A server SAS backplane, or cables such as SFF-8087 to SFF-8482 adapters&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;An operating system that can correctly identify the two logical disks from the same physical drive&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The controller card itself may not be expensive.
The real hassle is the full chain of cabling, compatibility, cooling, power, and available PCIe space.
If the machine is already tight on space, airflow, cables, or expansion slots, this drive adds real friction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;do-not-treat-the-two-7tb-disks-as-backups-of-each-other&#34;&gt;Do Not Treat the Two 7TB Disks as Backups of Each Other
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The easiest mistake is treating the two 7TB logical disks shown by the system as two independent drives.
They are not two physical disks; they are two logical units inside the same physical hard drive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If these two 7TB logical disks are configured as RAID 1, it may look like a mirror, but the practical value is very limited.
They share the same enclosure, controller board, power path, and part of the same mechanical environment.
If the physical drive, board, or power path fails, the original data and the supposed backup can disappear together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RAID 5 and RAID 6 also require caution.
Traditional RAID 5 usually tolerates the failure of one physical disk, but when a dual-arm drive fails, the array may effectively lose two 7TB logical disks at the same time.
If the array design does not account for this failure model, redundancy can be defeated very easily.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So this type of drive is better understood as one fast, large, risk-concentrated disk, not as two independent disks that can safely protect each other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;how-to-use-it-in-nas-systems&#34;&gt;How to Use It in NAS Systems
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;If hardware passthrough and driver recognition work properly, systems such as FNOS, TrueNAS, Unraid, and Windows can usually see the two 7TB logical disks.
The key question is not whether the system can see them, but how they should be used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In FNOS, the two 7TB logical disks can be combined into a RAID 0 storage space to gain sequential throughput.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In TrueNAS, creating a storage pool may trigger a prompt about using disks with the same serial number.
If you are sure you want to use this drive, you can allow it, place the two logical disks into the same vdev, and choose Stripe instead of Mirror.
Mirror creates an unreliable illusion of redundancy here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Unraid, it is not recommended to put the two logical disks into the main array with a parity disk.
A better approach is to create a separate cache pool or dedicated high-speed pool, use Btrfs or ZFS for an independent RAID 0, and assign it to temporary high-speed data, downloads, transcoding cache, or data that can be rebuilt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows can also identify and use the disks, with similar logic: striping can improve sequential performance, but it should not be treated as a real two-drive backup plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;lifespan-temperature-and-power-still-matter&#34;&gt;Lifespan, Temperature, and Power Still Matter
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The dual-arm design improves performance, but it also makes the mechanical structure more complex.
These drives contain two head-arm assemblies and more head components, which naturally means more mechanical risk points.
Since most units on the used market are retired enterprise drives, real power-on hours, previous workload, handling history, and transport condition are often unclear.
Specification-sheet endurance numbers should not be trusted blindly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Power and cooling also matter.
Under full load, power consumption may exceed 11W, and shell temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius are not unusual.
If the drive is installed in a small case, dense drive cage, or low-airflow NAS, sustained heat can further affect stability and lifespan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;who-should-buy-it&#34;&gt;Who Should Buy It
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;This drive is suitable for people who are comfortable building a DIY NAS, already have the right SAS hardware, understand the risks of RAID 0, and mainly handle large sequential files.
Media libraries, download caches, temporary project storage, and rebuildable data pools can all benefit from its capacity and speed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not suitable for:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Users of off-the-shelf branded NAS systems&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Users who do not want to buy a SAS card and adapter cables&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Primary storage with high data-safety requirements&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Users who want to use the two 7TB logical disks as a RAID 1 backup&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Workloads dominated by small files, virtual-machine random I/O, or databases&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the goal is low-cost capacity and fast sequential reads and writes, the Exos 2X14 / Mach.2 is genuinely interesting.
But its proper role is a cheap, fast, tinkerer-friendly special-purpose drive, not a universal NAS disk that everyone can buy without thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hard drives have prices; data has value.
This kind of dual-arm drive can be worth buying, but it is best used only for recoverable, rebuildable, or separately backed-up data.
Truly important files should still live inside a clear and reliable backup strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
